Monitoring gait quality in daily activities through wearable sensors has the potential to improve medical assessment in Parkinson’s Disease (PD). In this study, four gait partitioning methods, two based on thresholds and two based on a machine learning approach, considering the four-phase model, were compared. The methods were tested on 26 PD patients, both in OFF and ON levodopa conditions, and 11 healthy subjects, during walking tasks. All subjects were equipped with inertial sensors placed on feet. Force resistive sensors were used to assess reference time sequence of gait phases. Goodness Index (G) was evaluated to assess accuracy in gait phases estimation. A novel synthetic index called Gait Phase Quality Index (GPQI) was proposed for gait quality assessment. Results revealed optimum performance (G < 0.25) for three tested methods and good performance (0.25 < G < 0.70) for one threshold method. The GPQI resulted significantly higher in PD patients than in healthy subjects, showing a moderate correlation with clinical scales score. Furthermore, in patients with severe gait impairment, GPQI was found higher in OFF than in ON state. Our results unveil the possibility of monitoring gait quality in PD through real-time gait partitioning based on wearable sensors.

Measuring gait quality in parkinson’s disease through real-time gait phase recognition / Mileti, Ilaria; Germanotta, Marco; Di Sipio, Enrica; Imbimbo, Isabella; Pacilli, Alessandra; Erra, Carmen; Petracca, Martina; Rossi, Stefano; Del Prete, Zaccaria; Bentivoglio, Anna Rita; Padua, Luca; Palermo, Eduardo. - In: SENSORS. - ISSN 1424-8220. - 18:3(2018). [10.3390/s18030919]

Measuring gait quality in parkinson’s disease through real-time gait phase recognition

Mileti, Ilaria
;
Germanotta, Marco;Pacilli, Alessandra;Del Prete, Zaccaria;Palermo, Eduardo
2018

Abstract

Monitoring gait quality in daily activities through wearable sensors has the potential to improve medical assessment in Parkinson’s Disease (PD). In this study, four gait partitioning methods, two based on thresholds and two based on a machine learning approach, considering the four-phase model, were compared. The methods were tested on 26 PD patients, both in OFF and ON levodopa conditions, and 11 healthy subjects, during walking tasks. All subjects were equipped with inertial sensors placed on feet. Force resistive sensors were used to assess reference time sequence of gait phases. Goodness Index (G) was evaluated to assess accuracy in gait phases estimation. A novel synthetic index called Gait Phase Quality Index (GPQI) was proposed for gait quality assessment. Results revealed optimum performance (G < 0.25) for three tested methods and good performance (0.25 < G < 0.70) for one threshold method. The GPQI resulted significantly higher in PD patients than in healthy subjects, showing a moderate correlation with clinical scales score. Furthermore, in patients with severe gait impairment, GPQI was found higher in OFF than in ON state. Our results unveil the possibility of monitoring gait quality in PD through real-time gait partitioning based on wearable sensors.
2018
gait phases recognition; gait quality; machine learning; motor fluctuations; parkinson’s disease; wearable sensor system; foot; humans; machine earning; parkinson disease; gait; analytical chemistry; atomic and molecular physics, and optics; biochemistry; instrumentation; electrical and electronic engineering
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Measuring gait quality in parkinson’s disease through real-time gait phase recognition / Mileti, Ilaria; Germanotta, Marco; Di Sipio, Enrica; Imbimbo, Isabella; Pacilli, Alessandra; Erra, Carmen; Petracca, Martina; Rossi, Stefano; Del Prete, Zaccaria; Bentivoglio, Anna Rita; Padua, Luca; Palermo, Eduardo. - In: SENSORS. - ISSN 1424-8220. - 18:3(2018). [10.3390/s18030919]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Mileti_measuring_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.53 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1140151
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact